Posts

Showing posts from 2012

Litigation-I Win, You Lose vs. Mediation-Win/Win

Image
  Litigation is a zero-sum game.  It destroys relationships and fosters enmity between the parties.  Parties rarely walk away happy.  Even if they win, the expense of litigation is enormous, and collecting on judgments is difficult. Disputes ultimately resolve, but the focus on winning at any cost can lead to prolonged legal battles.  Living with a lawsuit causes ongoing stress, which can distract you from your business and even have an effect on your health. In a courtroom, the final decision lies with a judge or jury who may not fully grasp the complexities of the case. Parties relinquish control over the outcome, potentially leaving them dissatisfied with the final judgment. Mediation has the opposite effect.   Rather than polarizing people, it enables the parties to attack the issues and not each other.     The process promotes open communication, collaboration and problem-solving, which enables parties to actively participate in crafting ...

Legal Tools for the Contractor's Toolbox

I was just thinking about two recent clients who were owed money by owners.  One had a contract that was not in compliance with the Massachusetts Home Improvement Contractor Statute and had waited a long time to pursue his money.  The other had a contract that fully protected him and contacted me once communication had broken down with the customer.  In the first case, my client ended up writing the homeowner a check because he couldn't face the risk of the multiple damages, attorney's fees, interest and costs that are available to the homeowner under the Consumer Protection Statute (c. 93A).  In the case of the second, I had no qualms about filing a mechanic's lien and pursuing payment aggressively because my client was in full compliance with state law. Just as no respectable contractor would work with poor quality tools, contractors and construction companies should make sure that they are working with high-quality legal "tools" that will protect them ...

The Massachusetts Prompt Pay Statute and Back Charges

I recently had the occasion to file my first lawsuit under the (relatively) new Prompt Pay Statute in Massachusetts.  The Prompt Pay Statute applies to construction projects of three million dollars or more.  There is a clause in the law that covers change orders.  It states that in order for a change order to be rejected, the owner or higher level contractor must state the contractual or factual basis for the rejection, and must certify that it is made in good faith.  The rejection also has to be made within a certain amount of time after submission of the change order depending on the level of the contractor (30 days for the owner plus 7 days for each level of subcontractor on down).  As part of this lawsuit, I alleged that back charges were issued late in violation of the contract, but I also stated that back charges are simply change orders after the fact, and for that reason,  the owner should have to state the contractual or factual basis fo...

Mechanic's Liens Basics in Massachusetts

Although I have written about mechanic's liens in the past, the power of a lien cannot be underestimated and bears repeating.  The right to file a lien is a huge advantage for contractors and construction companies, and is a unique tool that helps contractors get paid.  As long as the construction company has a written contract with the owner, it can file a lien on a property within ninety days of the date the it last worked at the project.  If the contractor is a subcontractor, the time for filing is extended to within ninety days of the last date that someone working by and through the general contractor worked at the project.  These deadlines are strict, and if they are missed, then the company can no longer file a valid mechanic's lien. A lien consists of two documents; a Notice of Contract and a Statement of Account.  The Notice of Contract may be filed at the Registry of Deeds at the start of a project to put the public on notice that the company is work...

When the Homeowner is a Bully

I've seen a new trend in contractor disputes lately, and it isn't pretty.  Some homeowners are making unreasonable demands on contractors, and bullying them into doing work without getting paid.  They unreasonably withhold payments, or impose penalties for delays that they cause.  They expect contractors to do all kinds of extra work without being paid or changing the completion date. I have had a series of these recently.  What is a contractor to do? When first meeting with a homeowner, trust your instincts.  If you are sensing red flags, do not take the job. Never let the work get ahead of the money.  If there is a change order, make sure that the payment is contemporaneous with the work. Make sure that all change orders are in writing and reflect any change in the contract price and date of substantial completion. Include a provision in your contract that entitles you to get attorney's fees if you have to go after a client for payment. Make sure t...

How to Get Paid

It seems as though clients' disputes come in waves.  The latest pattern that has emerged is contractors are finding that they are having trouble getting paid.  As usual, the best way to deal with this problem is by preventing it entirely.  The two tools in your arsenal are your contract, and written change orders. Prior to starting any job, a contractor or construction company should negotiate a clear-cut payment schedule that makes payment conditioned upon milestones. The work should never get ahead of the payment and vice-versa.  Payments should be broken down into numerous, frequent payments.  That way if either side is having money trouble, it will be discovered before huge receivables accrue. The contract should also have a clause that the contractor is entitled to stop work if payment is not made within a certain time period.  That way the contractor will not be accused of breaching the contract or abandoning the job if he refuses to wor...