Litigation-I Win, You Lose vs. Mediation-Win/Win

Image
  Litigation is a zero-sum game.  It destroys relationships and fosters enmity between the parties.  Parties rarely walk away happy.  Even if they win, the expense of litigation is enormous, and collecting on judgments is difficult. Disputes ultimately resolve, but the focus on winning at any cost can lead to prolonged legal battles.  Living with a lawsuit causes ongoing stress, which can distract you from your business and even have an effect on your health. In a courtroom, the final decision lies with a judge or jury who may not fully grasp the complexities of the case. Parties relinquish control over the outcome, potentially leaving them dissatisfied with the final judgment. Mediation has the opposite effect.   Rather than polarizing people, it enables the parties to attack the issues and not each other.     The process promotes open communication, collaboration and problem-solving, which enables parties to actively participate in crafting ...

Your Contract Was the Best Money I Ever Spent

A client really said this to me last week.  He said the difference between having my contract now vs. when he had a similar problem many years ago was that now he can sleep through the night.  Here's the story:  client was doing a major construction job for a homeowner.  The homeowner was delaying in making decisions, and the contractor was wondering if he could terminate the contract before making a major outlay for the next step.


He called me, and I looked at his contract, which included the following provision:


"If Owner fails to comply with the provisions of this Contract, Contractor may terminate this Contract and retain any deposit or monies received as liquidated damages, or at the option of Contractor, Contractor may proceed for specific performance or any other available legal or equitable remedies.

Owner will be in default under this Contract if any of the following events take place:

(b)   Owner in any way fails or refuses to perform any provisions of the Contract and the Contract Documents required of Owner."

Since the Contractor could terminate the contract if the Owner did not perform any provisions of the Contract (the homeowners were causing an unreasonable delay), the Contractor was within his rights to cancel the contract.

This situation demonstrates the importance of a good contract. The contract clearly spelled out the Contractor's rights when the Homeowners were not cooperating. This saved him a huge amount of anxiety over an uncomfortable situation.  As we lawyers like to say, "you can pay me now or pay me later, but later is always more expensive."

So, investing in a good contract will protect you if issues arise over the course of your project.  I would also like to add that it was awfully nice to have a client appreciate the work I did for him.


Popular posts from this blog

Eligibility Requirements for the LEED Green Associate Exam from Green Building Education and Training

What are the eligibility requirements for the LEED Green Associate exam? http://www.green-buildings.com/content/78626-what-are-eligibility-requirements-leed-green-associate-exam After March 31st, 2009, candidates for the LEED Green Associate (GA) credentials must fulfill eligibility requirements. LEED Green Associate candidates are required to do ONE (1) of the following: Option 1: You must be (or have previously been) employed in a sustainable field of work This is perhaps one of the more nebulous requirements posed by the GBCI, because no definition of a "sustainable field of work" is given. The USGBC does state that the company needs to "relate to environmentalism or the green building industry". If you are in any doubt that your profession would qualify, contact the GBCI at gbci.org or by calling 1-800-795-1746. Option 2: You must be (or have been) involved in a LEED Certification Project To prove eligibility by way of LEED project involvement, you must have bee...
Read more

When the Homeowner is a Bully

I've seen a new trend in contractor disputes lately, and it isn't pretty.  Some homeowners are making unreasonable demands on contractors, and bullying them into doing work without getting paid.  They unreasonably withhold payments, or impose penalties for delays that they cause.  They expect contractors to do all kinds of extra work without being paid or changing the completion date. I have had a series of these recently.  What is a contractor to do? When first meeting with a homeowner, trust your instincts.  If you are sensing red flags, do not take the job. Never let the work get ahead of the money.  If there is a change order, make sure that the payment is contemporaneous with the work. Make sure that all change orders are in writing and reflect any change in the contract price and date of substantial completion. Include a provision in your contract that entitles you to get attorney's fees if you have to go after a client for payment. Make sure t...
Read more

Should a Contractor Have the Homeowner Test for Lead?

I would like to learn more about the advisability of lead testing.  Homeowners might not want their homes tested for lead, because it becomes public record, and may interfere with the sale of a home or the ability to obtain a mortgage or homeowners insurance.  In addition, I strongly advise contractors not to do the testing themselves.  Let the homeowner pay an independent company to do it.  Otherwise if the GC brings a claim against a lead testing company for a false negative, the company might state that the GC did not use the test kit properly.  If the homeowner does have the house tested, consider refusing to do the work unless the homeowner has lead abatement work done.
Read more