Litigation-I Win, You Lose vs. Mediation-Win/Win

Image
  Litigation is a zero-sum game.  It destroys relationships and fosters enmity between the parties.  Parties rarely walk away happy.  Even if they win, the expense of litigation is enormous, and collecting on judgments is difficult. Disputes ultimately resolve, but the focus on winning at any cost can lead to prolonged legal battles.  Living with a lawsuit causes ongoing stress, which can distract you from your business and even have an effect on your health. In a courtroom, the final decision lies with a judge or jury who may not fully grasp the complexities of the case. Parties relinquish control over the outcome, potentially leaving them dissatisfied with the final judgment. Mediation has the opposite effect.   Rather than polarizing people, it enables the parties to attack the issues and not each other.     The process promotes open communication, collaboration and problem-solving, which enables parties to actively participate in crafting ...

When You Shouldn’t Mediate Your Construction Dispute

Photo by Cytonn Photography on Unsplash



Mediation is a wonderful form of dispute resolution.  It allows the parties to craft their own resolution to a conflict.  It frequently repairs relationships.  Parties tend to comply more with mediated settlements.   That said, there are definitely times when you should not mediate.

As a refresher, mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution where the parties attempt to negotiate a settlement of their dispute with the aid of a third-party, neutral mediator.  It is a confidential process.  If the parties come to an agreement, that agreement becomes an enforceable contract.  Since parties have control over whether they come to an agreement, they are much more likely to comply with a mediated settlement than a judgment.

So, when not to mediate?

When the other side refuses.

Mediation is supposed to be a voluntary process.  The parties are supposed to attend a mediation session in good faith.  There is no point in wasting everyone’s time by attending a mediation session and refusing any sort of compromise or not being willing to listen.  If the other side won’t play, don’t bother.

If the law and the facts are on your side.

As a lawyer I can tell you that I have rarely been involved in a dispute where the situation was absolutely black and white, but it can happen.  If you are absolutely going to win, why mediate?

If there is a power imbalance.

Parties really can’t mediate if one side has most of the power.  If you don’t have any leverage in a situation, there may be no point in mediating.  It may be cheaper to just try to settle or have your lawyer negotiate for you.

If the relationship has been abusive.

This is really a variation of a power imbalance, but worse.  If there has been abuse by one party against another, then it would not only be inadvisable to mediate, it could be dangerous.  The abused individual may make decisions that are against his or her best interest.  If the person is not represented by counsel, it would be dangerous to even be in the same room as the abuser.

When it isn’t cost effective.

Most disputes come down to money.  I cynically tell my litigation clients that it is their job to persuade the mediator to advocate for their position.  As a preliminary matter, mediators need to determine who is writing a check to whom; then, it’s a matter of how much.  If you believe money should be coming your way, but you don’t think a mediator would see it that way, then don’t bother.  Mediation typically saves money because the parties come to an agreement and litigation ends.  That said, spending eight hours mediating and not coming to an agreement just costs the parties money.  During the mediation you may find out some valuable information, but at the end of the day, it has to be worth it.

The timing isn’t right.

Sometimes parties rush into mediation before they have exchanged any information or have evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of their position.  At times, the parties’ contract requires mediation, but no one is really ready.  In that scenario, it is better to waive mediation and pursue it at a later date when the process has more of a chance of being successful.

Although I firmly believe that mediation is a wonderful thing, that doesn’t mean it is suitable for every dispute.  For a mediation to be successful, it has to be done when the time is right, when the parties are read to participate in good faith and when everyone is motivated to do the work to discuss the issues and possible solutions.  If you are ready to mediate your dispute, give me a call at 617-953-3760, or email me at agoldman@goldmanlg.com.

  

Popular posts from this blog

Eligibility Requirements for the LEED Green Associate Exam from Green Building Education and Training

What are the eligibility requirements for the LEED Green Associate exam? http://www.green-buildings.com/content/78626-what-are-eligibility-requirements-leed-green-associate-exam After March 31st, 2009, candidates for the LEED Green Associate (GA) credentials must fulfill eligibility requirements. LEED Green Associate candidates are required to do ONE (1) of the following: Option 1: You must be (or have previously been) employed in a sustainable field of work This is perhaps one of the more nebulous requirements posed by the GBCI, because no definition of a "sustainable field of work" is given. The USGBC does state that the company needs to "relate to environmentalism or the green building industry". If you are in any doubt that your profession would qualify, contact the GBCI at gbci.org or by calling 1-800-795-1746. Option 2: You must be (or have been) involved in a LEED Certification Project To prove eligibility by way of LEED project involvement, you must have bee...
Read more

When the Homeowner is a Bully

I've seen a new trend in contractor disputes lately, and it isn't pretty.  Some homeowners are making unreasonable demands on contractors, and bullying them into doing work without getting paid.  They unreasonably withhold payments, or impose penalties for delays that they cause.  They expect contractors to do all kinds of extra work without being paid or changing the completion date. I have had a series of these recently.  What is a contractor to do? When first meeting with a homeowner, trust your instincts.  If you are sensing red flags, do not take the job. Never let the work get ahead of the money.  If there is a change order, make sure that the payment is contemporaneous with the work. Make sure that all change orders are in writing and reflect any change in the contract price and date of substantial completion. Include a provision in your contract that entitles you to get attorney's fees if you have to go after a client for payment. Make sure t...
Read more

Should a Contractor Have the Homeowner Test for Lead?

I would like to learn more about the advisability of lead testing.  Homeowners might not want their homes tested for lead, because it becomes public record, and may interfere with the sale of a home or the ability to obtain a mortgage or homeowners insurance.  In addition, I strongly advise contractors not to do the testing themselves.  Let the homeowner pay an independent company to do it.  Otherwise if the GC brings a claim against a lead testing company for a false negative, the company might state that the GC did not use the test kit properly.  If the homeowner does have the house tested, consider refusing to do the work unless the homeowner has lead abatement work done.
Read more